good design - government approved?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49604/496047abf8314c6a11b1b93b01b0699d1b7c1cdb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/026c3/026c34ac534d53bbf4a6b7bb8674d112406ddb11" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc35/abc358da738828d671e37cc073e31a2b2597879f" alt=""
This is one of my favorite buildings in LA. What shocks me even more than the fact that it got built is the fact that its a government building. From my own experience in working graphic design projects where committees are involved, I can only imagine the meetings architects for projects like this must go through. Good creative is rarely done by committee. Perhaps my perception is wrong and that a government contract may actually allow more freedom for an architect than a private one?
This is the Caltrans District 7 Headquarters in Downtown LA by Thom Mayne/Morphosis Architects. The shapes and forms evoke freeways, movement, and mobility. In fact, the building moves and changes depending on the sunlight and weather conditions. My drive-by photos don't do it justice, but wirednewyork.com has a great article and photos here:
and more photos can be found here on arcspace.com: